5 Comments
Jan 12, 2023Liked by Jonathan Reece

I'm always right except when I'm wrong 🙄

I tested my IQ some 15 years a go and was at 135 but I've never thought of myself as much above average.

You mentioned assem malhotra, I feel I was helpful in pointing him in the right direction regarding jabs. His Father had recently died and he was furious at the ambulance delay which he saw as the main reason for the death. I didn't provide any data I just said 'I'm surprised you haven't figured out the damage the jab is causing yet'. His reaction was initially shocked at my suggestion but within a few weeks he was speaking up.

Great article to listen to on my long lunch break, cheers.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for reading it!

Expand full comment
author

135: I suppose that depends on who you were surrounded by.

That's very interesting about Malhotra. I feel simultaneously pleased with him for waking up to some extent, annoyed with him for sounding a bit arrogant when he is so ignorant of the background, and sorry for him, like all of us, going through this abuse.

(That sounds quite a long lunch break)! ;-)

Expand full comment
Jan 12, 2023Liked by Jonathan Reece

I'd also have a question I have wondered about in regards to who got the jab, as an engineer I think we are taught to read and confirm data better than most people and if that translated into lower jab rates amongst engineering type specialists who if the data is wrong then what they do fails.

What I'm trying to say is biology is wishy washy and building an aeroplane is a bit more definitive, did this affect who got the jab?

Expand full comment
author

Yes, indeed: that's another interesting thought about the sort of selection pressure on the population. There may be a preponderance of engineers in future!

The U-shaped "hesitancy": that accords with my experience - people at either end of the academic spectrum.

Expand full comment